Arguments Against Ethical Egoism. This critical writing on Ethical egoism was written and submitted by your fellow student. Free essay sample on the given topic "Magical Realism In Literature". In this paper, I will explain what ethical egoism is, ethical egoism essay, give examples why ethical egoism is incorrect, provide examples that support ethical egoism, ethical egoism essay clarify why those reasons are inaccurate. Ethical egoism does not, require moral individuals to harm the interests and well-being of others when making moral deliberation.
Ethical egoism
In other words, psychological egoism defines how we do behave and ethical egoism defines how we ought to behave Rachels, p. To better understand, one must fully understand what ethical egoism clearly means. Ethical Egoism does not state we should avoid helping others but rather only promote our own interest. If our interest co middle of paper e should pursue our best long-term self-interest independently of others, but do not avoid acts that coincidentally help others. These advantages of ethical egoism together with the disadvantages should be weighed per circumstance and moral codes should be followed when taking decision for ethical egoism essay two circumstances are exactly alike.
In conclusion, having examined the consequences of ethical egoism essay benefits and disadvantages of ethical egoism, I can say that ethical egoism seems to have a strong influence as to why individuals make certain decisions. Ethical egoism is not bad in itself, for one saves himself to save others. An individual cannot thrive if they stifle their needs to help. A good life worth living in my opinion requires serving and meeting the needs of others, as well as myself. We are expected to give unselfishly to our associates, friends, neighbors and family for good moral cause because it is purposeful in the end.
What would we reap from merely relying on our sole actions and how would that selfishness benefit us as a whole in society? This is where Kant and Nietzsche disagree on the definition of what is ethical egoism essay a good life, what is considered moral and who has the worth to decide upon it, ethical egoism essay. I will begin with Kant, as he was the first to develop his theory of morality. Ethical Egoism A rear assumption is that the needs and happiness of other people will always ethical egoism essay on our moral ethics. If we accept this assumption, we think that our moral ethics are balancing our self-interest against that of others. The idea of each person ought to pursue his or her own self -interest exclusively to do in his life time ethical egoism essay others is known as Ethical Egoism.
Foot Morality and its standards are often assumed to be 'intrinsically' motivating, and this is how they regulate society's behaviour. Prinz in Batson Yet Batson suggests rather than intrinsically motivating, we conform to the principles to avoid social and self-rewards, where we are viewed as morally good. Morality for Kant is determined by whether certain moral actions could be turned into a universal maxim. Theory Description Ethical egoism is a normative ethical position that focuses morally right action that promotes the individual own self interest, ethical egoism essay. It states that actions whose consequences will benefit the doer can be considered as ethical.
It differs from psychological egoism in that because ethical egoism says we ought to be selfish while psychological states we should be selfish Frankena, The theory in itself says we are hard-wired to be selfish and focus on what type of actions promote use and is self serving. Ethical egoism is the normative ethical position that moral agents ought to do what is in their own self-interest. It differs from psychological egoism, which claims that people can only act in their self-interest. Ethical egoism also differs from rational egoism, which holds that it is rational to act in one's self-interest. Ethical egoism conflicts with ethical altruism, which states that moral agents have an obligation to help anyone but themselves. Egoism and altruism both conflict with ethical utilitarianism, which claims that an individual should not treat themselves with higher regard than they have for others as egoism instructs, by elevating ones own self-interests and "the self" to a status not shared with others, ethical egoism essay.
In other words, Ethical Egoism is a moral viewpoint that believes it is morally right to only do what maximizes our own good or happiness. It is important to distinguish the differences between egoism and ethical egoism. An egoist may be considered selfish in that they are only concerned with maximizing their own personal good. In contrast, an ethical egoist would not be considered selfish in that they believe that everyone should maximize their own personal good and that it should be universal, not individual Holmes Morality is the philosophical study of moral action. It looks at what is right and wrong and how people should behave. In order to decide what is right and wrong, Kant came up with the theory of deontology, which is an ethical system based on the duties and moral obligations of society.
Deontology is best explained when the opposite theory of consequentialism is also understood. Consequentialism suggests that we should make moral decisions based on the consequence ethical egoism essay the action and the consequence of the action should make the greatest number of people happy. He focuses only on the reasoning and puts these intentions into a duty and good will definition, ethical egoism essay. When a person does an action out of duty, it is because the duty is something a person is ought to do, deeming the action to be morally worthy. Home Page Ethical Egoism Essay.
Ethical Egoism Essay Satisfactory Essays. Open Document, ethical egoism essay. Essay Sample Check Writing Quality. Ethical egoism is the position that moral individuals ought to do what is in their own self-interest. Ethical egoism contrasts with ethical altruism in which suggests that moral people have an obligation to help others. Ethical egoism does not, ethical egoism essay, require moral individuals to harm the interests and well-being of others when making moral deliberation. Ayn Rand deals with a more selfish approach whereas James Rachels believes that people should look out for one another. She furthermore goes on to state two difference moral questions in which altruism raises 1 What are values?
Henceforth stating that the second question is substituted for the first furthermore evading the questions all together elaborating on the idea that altruism has no set of moral values thus leaving man with no ethical egoism essay guidance. our own decisions. Whether they be good or bad depends on how you view your moral code. Ethical egoism teaches us that we ought to do what we as individuals feel is right. James Rachels and Ayn Rand are on opposite sides differing in opinions on the Ethical Egoism topic. Rachels depicts that as humans all living together in a confined space like that of a neighborhood, we should all look out for one another.
Rand in opposition states that as individuals we should only care about ourselves and that the best way to achieve true happiness is to ethical egoism essay only that. Being the logical choice my views ethical egoism essay with that of James Rachels and that if society as a whole came together and simply watched over one another for protection, simple gestures of happiness, and the occasional greeting as the neighbor drives down the street, the world as we know it may be that much better. Get Access. Satisfactory Essays. Arguments Against Ethical Egoism Words 2 Pages. Arguments Against Ethical Egoism. Read More. Good Essays. Ethical Egoism Pros And Cons Essay Words 2 Pages, ethical egoism essay. Ethical Egoism Pros And Cons Essay.
The Morality Of A Good Life Words 3 Pages. The Morality Of A Good Life. Pros And Cons Of Ethical Egoism Words ethical egoism essay Pages. Pros And Cons Of Ethical Egoism. Best Essays. Contrasting Kand and Hume on Morality Words 3 Pages 6 Works Cited. Contrasting Kand and Hume on Morality. Ethical Theory Of Ethical Egoism Words 3 Pages. Ethical Theory Of Ethical Egoism. Egoism And Ethical Egoism Words 2 Pages. Egoism And Ethical Egoism, ethical egoism essay. Egoism Vs Ethical Egoism Words 3 Pages. Egoism Vs Ethical Egoism. Morality And Morality Words 3 Pages. Morality And Morality. Kantian Ethics Words 2 Pages 1 Works Cited.
Kantian Ethics. Related Topics. Morality Ethical egoism.
drug essays
The ethical egoist need not be an egoist at heart; however he is selfish only for his benefit. This means that when it comes to making a decision about a solution to a problem, the individual would consider the benefits that he would receive from the decision and the impact received in the long run. Ethical egoists tend to look for the benefit that they may receive from a situation and would be certain in reaching a decision that would allow them to balance the good impact higher than the evil one. The ethical egoist looks for solving a problem in the best manner possible, of course with the intention of evaluating the situation from a perspective where the highest benefit would be received. There are a number of times in life when an individual would be asked as a third party to reach a solution between the other two involved parties.
This would allow the individual to consider all the angles of the problem and then make an ethical and dependable solution. If our interest co middle of paper e should pursue our best long-term self-interest independently of others, but do not avoid acts that coincidentally help others. These advantages of ethical egoism together with the disadvantages should be weighed per circumstance and moral codes should be followed when taking decision for no two circumstances are exactly alike. In conclusion, having examined the consequences of the benefits and disadvantages of ethical egoism, I can say that ethical egoism seems to have a strong influence as to why individuals make certain decisions.
Ethical egoism is not bad in itself, for one saves himself to save others. An individual cannot thrive if they stifle their needs to help. A good life worth living in my opinion requires serving and meeting the needs of others, as well as myself. We are expected to give unselfishly to our associates, friends, neighbors and family for good moral cause because it is purposeful in the end. What would we reap from merely relying on our sole actions and how would that selfishness benefit us as a whole in society? This is where Kant and Nietzsche disagree on the definition of what is considered a good life, what is considered moral and who has the worth to decide upon it. I will begin with Kant, as he was the first to develop his theory of morality.
Ethical Egoism A rear assumption is that the needs and happiness of other people will always effects on our moral ethics. If we accept this assumption, we think that our moral ethics are balancing our self-interest against that of others. The idea of each person ought to pursue his or her own self -interest exclusively to do in his life time for others is known as Ethical Egoism. Foot Morality and its standards are often assumed to be 'intrinsically' motivating, and this is how they regulate society's behaviour. Prinz in Batson Yet Batson suggests rather than intrinsically motivating, we conform to the principles to avoid social and self-rewards, where we are viewed as morally good.
Morality for Kant is determined by whether certain moral actions could be turned into a universal maxim. Theory Description Ethical egoism is a normative ethical position that focuses morally right action that promotes the individual own self interest. It states that actions whose consequences will benefit the doer can be considered as ethical. It differs from psychological egoism in that because ethical egoism says we ought to be selfish while psychological states we should be selfish Frankena, The theory in itself says we are hard-wired to be selfish and focus on what type of actions promote use and is self serving.
Ethical egoism is the normative ethical position that moral agents ought to do what is in their own self-interest. It differs from psychological egoism, which claims that people can only act in their self-interest. Ethical egoism also differs from rational egoism, which holds that it is rational to act in one's self-interest. Ethical egoism conflicts with ethical altruism, which states that moral agents have an obligation to help anyone but themselves. Egoism and altruism both conflict with ethical utilitarianism, which claims that an individual should not treat themselves with higher regard than they have for others as egoism instructs, by elevating ones own self-interests and "the self" to a status not shared with others. I will also be affected by personal guilt as a result of my inconsiderate attitude Hills, , p.
This would have a severe impact on my moral conscience and personal integrity. If my neighbor finds out in future that I lied to her, she will think of me as selfish and greedy. This action may also compromise my personal beliefs and moral standards. This would portray me as inconsiderate and may have a negative impact on my character. I have a strong belief that every individual needs to be selfless to ensure that his actions bring positive change to the society Hills, , p. It is necessary to consider other people before taking any action to ensure that individual choices a person makes do not expose other people to harm or ridicule. I need to take precautions to ensure my choices do not harm other people either physically or psychologically.
This is likely to affect my personal welfare negatively. I would make my neighbor aware that her ticket has just won the lottery. This would ease any guilty conscience on my part because it would help me maintain my integrity and high moral standards. This would make it possible for me to maintain good relations with my neighbor to ensure our mutual trust is not negatively affected. Selfishness is a negative trait that motivates people to engage in immoral acts. If I fail to divulge the truth to my neighbor, it will affect my character negatively and this will affect the way I relate with other people. There is a possibility that she needs the money more than I do to help her fulfill some personal needs and desires. If I fail to disclose what happened, I may end up ruining her life and future aspirations.
It is necessary to avoid actions that corrupt the mind and the soul. Ethical altruism encourages people to help others. I have a moral obligation to help my neighbor to increase her happiness and comfort. Ethical egoism encourages selfishness and this motivates humans to become greedier and insensitive. It is important to consider other people in whatever we do to ensure they are not negatively affected. I would also use the concept of ethical utilitarianism to make my decision. I would consider my neighbor as the owner of the ticket I have just purchased before making any decision Prichard, , p. If I claim the prize, then this act would be fraudulent because the ticket belongs to someone else. My actions would mean that I have broken the law and the trust conferred on me by my neighbor.
Therefore, I need to consider the overall consequences of my actions before making any choice.
No comments:
Post a Comment